![]() Four studies involved tests of significance, and two used modeling methods. Density and centrality were the most common network metrics although one study did not calculate any network properties and only visualized the network. Four administered network surveys, one coded observations, and one used an existing survey to extract network data. Two studies used mixed methods, four quantitative methods only, and one involved an experimental design. Four studies looked at multidisciplinary healthcare workers, while two focused on nurses. The six articles meeting our inclusion criteria described unique health sectors: one at primary healthcare level and five at tertiary level five conducted in the USA, one in Australia. We used narrative synthesis to summarize the findings. The final set of articles had their citations prospectively and retrospectively screened. ![]() The search identified 10 systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria were study of health care worker professional communication, network methods used, and patient outcomes measured. Ten databases were searched from 1990 through April 2016, yielding 5970 articles screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers who extracted data and critically appraised each study. This systematic review seeks to analyze what social network methods have been used to study professional communication and performance among healthcare providers. Applications in the health sector remain underutilized. Social network analysis quantifies and visualizes relationships between and among individuals or organizations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |